PrinterMS

PrinterMS or MPS Monitor: monitoring or invoicing?

MPS Monitor sets a benchmark for fleet data collection: multi-brand SNMP readings, live toner levels and supplies forecasting across millions of printers. It deliberately leaves invoicing to an external ERP. PrinterMS includes data collection through its own DCA agent and turns readings into Hungarian invoices in the same system, with contracts, minimums and excess usage charges. The choice depends on whether you need a monitoring layer or the full meter-to-invoice workflow.

MPS Monitor currently offers deeper data collection, with an embedded agent, machine-learning forecasts and millions of printers. PrinterMS brings DCA, contracts, fee calculation and Hungarian invoicing together, without requiring a second billing application.

Updated: 10 July 2026

Choose PrinterMS if

Leasing businesses that want Hungarian invoices from meter readings, with contract management, without a separate billing ERP.

MPS Monitor is a better fit if

Operators of large, mixed-brand fleets whose priority is extensive unattended data collection and supplies forecasting, with invoicing handled elsewhere.

PrinterMS vs MPS Monitor: point by point

CriteriaPrinterMSMPS Monitor
Multi-brand data collection (SNMP)Own DCA agent: meter readings, toner and error codes across brands, plus email readingsExtensive multi-brand SNMP and an embedded agent
Supplies forecastingCatalogue capacity and low-toner alertsMachine-learning forecasts for individual cartridge depletion
Billing engineNative meter-to-invoice workflow, page prices, minimums and printer replacementsNone; passes meter data to an external ERP
Contract managementFull lifecycle, versioned templates and scheduled price increasesNo contract or fee engine
Hungarian invoicing and NAVBillingo, Számlázz.hu and NAV Online SzámlaNone
AI supplier invoice processingAutomatic extraction from incoming invoices into inventoryNone
Integration breadthCurrently limited, focused on Hungarian invoicing providers100+ ERP/CRM connectors and a public API
CertificationsModern stack, RLS, encryption and MFA; no SOC 2/ISO certification yetSOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001

Are they direct competitors?

Only partly. MPS Monitor focuses on collecting meter data as broadly as possible, then hands invoicing to another system. PrinterMS also includes collection through its own DCA agent, but its core includes billing, contract management and fee calculation. MPS Monitor needs a second system for invoicing; PrinterMS covers readings through to invoices itself.

Related:Billing featurePrinter fleet management

Where is MPS Monitor stronger today?

In the depth of data collection. Its embedded agent and machine-learning supplies forecasts have been refined across millions of printers and currently offer broader capabilities than the PrinterMS DCA. PrinterMS reads mixed fleets through standard SNMP, collecting meter readings, toner levels and error codes across brands, with email readings as an additional source. If extensive data collection and forecasting are your sole priorities, MPS Monitor currently goes further in that area.

The takeaway

For turning meter readings into Hungarian invoices with contracts and NAV reporting, PrinterMS provides the layer MPS Monitor leaves to another system. For the deepest supplies forecasting, MPS Monitor currently has the advantage. The deciding difference is whether invoicing needs a second application or lives alongside readings in the same software.

Related:View pricing

Frequently asked questions

pays for itself.

A small price increase your customers will barely notice can cover the cost of the software. Try it with your own figures: if it does not convince you within 60 days, we will refund every fee.

Get started with a 60-day guarantee

Payment starts on day one, with a 60-day money-back guarantee. Cancel at any time. EU data storage and Hungarian-language support.